Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 07:23

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What is the best sunscreen lotion for oily skin for men?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
F1 reveals 2026 calendar as Madrid replaces Imola - Motorsport.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What does it mean if someone asks if it’s pink?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Is T-Mobile secretly recording your phone's screen? How to check and turn it off - ZDNET
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Common daily vitamin could slow biological aging, major study suggests - AOL.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear: